Quite a mixed bag in terms of the areas covered, but 'online communities' was definitely the most popular.
George Terhanian - President, Harris Interactive, Europe - gave the keynote in which he questioned the representativeness of online research, given the make up of online panels, and queeried the 'wisdom of crowds', claiming that the oft-quoted US presidential election predictions from the Iowa Electronic Market, were in fact no more reliable than the opinion polls. In response to the former point, Ray Poynter asked whether Terhanian really still considered telephone research still to be the gold standard - even in countries like Finland where only 50% of the population has a landline. And in response to Terhanian's second point, re the IEM, Pete Comley questioned the validity of the 7-day moving average re-basing which had been used to produce the results cited by Terhanian.
Ozge Odman Schmid - R&D Product Research Manager for Global Hair Styling Business at P&G - and Mike Waite of MarketTools co-presented on lessons learned from running 'Hairsay' - a community for 200 'hair-involved' consumers. The community has been running for about 18 months and their key observations were as follows:
1. Value to P&G: 'news from the marketplace'; 'having a finger on the pulse'; 'having a platform to continuously share and develop upstream ideas'; 'stimulus for innovation'; not 'screening' per se, but sometimes a reality check.
2. Participation: most topics attracted 20-30 participants - a 'hot topic' would be one involving 40 or more. One comment per week was the norm for members.
3. Incentives: 'less than CommuniSpace' (said to be $5-10 per month) and more 'intrinsic' (including prizes of new hair care products).
4. Moderation: entirely moderated by MarketTools who police for 'negative comments' and 'bad language' (but noted that it was important to preserve authenticity). MarketTools tag entries themselves, rather than allowing members to do this.
5. Recruitment: by MarketTools from their global panel - 'early adopters' and 'beauty junkies' from 12 different countries. 200 limit set to protect P&G's IP (internal policy).
6. Results: weekly topline summary, plus a more detailed monthly learnings summary. (Both speakers emphasized the importance of team get-togethers.)
7. Launch process: one month to design; pilot with 20 members used to seed content; 4-6 week warm-up period to show members how to contribute; 2.5 months to become fully operational.
When asked whether the community had resulted directly in the development of any new products, Ozge said that community had 'generated 5-10 concepts' that had been progressed to screening.
EuLin Goh, a market research executive at British Airways, spoke about the community they had created with Virtual Surveys. 198 members had signed up, drawn from BA's Executive Club. 106 posted at least once, while 41 had posted more than 10 times. 47% of the members were 'lurkers'. 41% of the threads had been started by the members themselves, who accounted for 90% of all posts (compared with 7% from the moderators and 1% from BA.)
Pete Comley of Virtual Surveys, presented on the subject of the unsustainability of online panels and the idea that, in the US at least, we are at the point of 'peak panel' and that from now on panel membership (and quality) will fall. (No one is claiming that communities will replace online panels as sources of representative sample - and no one seems to have any ideas as to what will.)
The non-community-themed presentations included Orlando's 'FaceTrace' presentation which was very warmly received and provoked more questions than any other during the day.